|
Klasyczne typy plików nie są już dostępne od stycznia 2021 r. Możesz przenieść swoje klasyczne pliki lub pobrać plik PDF. Dowiedz się więcej

Best solution to avoid accidentally pasting over an existing XBRL fact?

0

Komentarze

Komentarze: 2

  • Yumiko Okazaki

    I agree with Stephanie's post above. It is really too easy to paste over the existing tags if we forget to hit the create new button. I finally have got the hang of it and it doesn't happen as often now but it was a challenge at first. I thought that if there is a pop up questions that asks "do you want to paste over existing level __ tag or create new tag" it might be helpful. Or an Undo button would be much appreciated.

    1
  • Barbara

    Certainly an Undo or Discard XBRL changes would be useful!  A lot of outline mistakes could be avoided with an Undo XBRL button. 

    I have noticed a couple of things that have made life a little easier.  One is that there doesn't seem to be the need to Add Fact if tagging a new row or new numbers within an existing table.  XBRL knows that you are already in a table.  For tagging new numbers within straight text, I tend to create a link and immediately open the fact menu from the right vertical menu.  Then I can see if I am looking at the Level 1 tag or at No Fact if I have clicked correctly within the new link.  This has stopped even a very tired me from having either too many facts or deleting the Level 1.

    I do have another question though.  Has anyone come up with a straightforward way to tag multiple facts within a cell?  I keep ending up with way too many facts for the same link and nothing for others (specifically on the face of the Balance Sheet, e.g.)

    0

Zaloguj się, aby dodać komentarz.