<i class="icon-match-category w-icon w-icon-29 wk-mr-6 w-icon-twfr-xbrl-ixbrl w-icon-two-color" data-category-id="360005233792"></i><i class="w-icon w-icon-xbrl-fact-create w-icon-two-color"></i><i class="w-icon w-icon-calendar w-icon-two-color"></i> General discussion and Q&A for XBRL and iXBRL, including tagging, mapping and modeling, fact properties and accuracies, calculations, taxonomy migrations, validations, and how-tos. <p>Looking for more in-depth training? Check out <a href="https://www.training.workiva.com/collections/a29532d8-dbea-11ea-a9f9-067360dfb065?utm_source=community&utm_medium=link&utm_campaign=lh_help_comm_2021" target="_blank">what's available on the Learning Hub</a>.
Hi, I saw an article or post with a nice summary of current and upcoming XBRL tagging requirements on various SEC filings. But I can't remember where it is located. If you have an XBRL tagging summary, please share in this community. Thanks. Ken
Is there a way to lock XBRL? I believe the current lock feature doesn't allow new XBRL to be created on text, but does it also limit capability in terms of changing fact details?
DQC error states "user is using the axis RelatedAndNonrelatedPartyStatusAxis. This axis will be deprecated in the 2024 taxonomy and should not be used in 2023 filings. The filer should use the RelatedPartyTransactionsByRelatedPartyAxis axis as a r...
Hi, I would like to share this link from the SEC on the sample XBRL comment letter to filers. SEC.gov | Sample Letter to Companies Regarding Their XBRL Disclosures[1]
Curious why Workiva thought it necessary to slightly move the XBRL fact details, validation, etc... buttons on the right side panel? It is such a small change, was it worth the effort? I'm truly curious.
Is it ok to use member tags on the face statements?
I noticed that anytime I add a new tag in the document and mark it verified/flagged for the reviewer, it does not show up in the summary review tab as verified/flagged. If I change an existing tag, it is reflecting in the summary tab but not for n...
I am getting the error that the total value does not match XBRL-calculated weight, however the total that it is saying is wrong includes a concept that is not showing up in the calculation report (even though it is included in the calculation for ...
Hi, We are making financial statements and a bit of discussion, loosely based on a 10-Q format, but it isn't a 10-Q. Because of the reason we are creating this document, I have to add XBRL. However, if I choose a 10-Q as a document type, it want...
Hello filing enthusiasts! You may have seen that on June 20, 2023, the EDGAR release 23.2 included the support for new and updated taxonomies, including the 2023 SEC IFRS taxonomy. The Workiva Team is working on adding the SEC IFRS taxonomy to our...
The three-year transition period provides form 11K filers enough time to prepare and get ready for the inline XBRL mandate - just wanted to know if any filer will tag their form 11K this year? Thanks!
We are thrilled to announce that the ECD 2023 Taxonomy has been released in the Workiva platform and is now available as a standalone taxonomy as needed for proxy filings and also within the US GAAP 2023 and US GAAP 2023 (CEF 2023) taxonomies. For...
Taxonomy for the Pillar 3 Data Hub (attached documentation, p. 16-19). This taxonomy will be published in June starting with the pilot phase and it will start to apply by January, 2025.
Hi All, I was working on tagging some information about derivatives, but I'm running into a duplicate fact error because I am required to use the extensible enumeration related to the concept. Basically, I have two values that are using the same c...
We received this DQC error, not sure how to fix. We've looked everywhere for the axis ScheduleOfEquityMethodInvestmentEquityMethodInvesteeNameAxis, but it doesn't seem to be in the taxonomy? (DQC) The filer has reported a value for the element us-...
We've encountered an "unexpected error" in our validation report. It is the only red error we have which may stop us from filing, and we are not sure how to fix. This came about when we tried to fix a nesting warning message for an Axis, which had...
Are there any issues with having extra concepts, member and axis tags in the outline that aren't in the document. I don't think it necessarily causes any validation messages, so we are able to file. Are there any other concerns we should be aware ...
Hi, It came to my attention that the Arelle Filing Index is no longer available. Is there an alternative site that provides similar XBRL statistics, like taxonomy version and DQC errors? Thanks. Ken
Can you tell me what kind of value formatting I need to use to get this to display as SCHEDULE 14A but still have an XBRL value of DEF 14A? I also have it tagged in the DEI tab.
I am unable to change the label one of the line items in my statement of income. I've tried to delete the fact from the outline and re-add, but the error still pops up in the outline. What can I do to remove it?
Hello, Currently have 2 tag with the same table text block but different member. However, by doing that, it creates an "Uncategorized" section within the SEC viewer due to the separate text block member is not within the outline. Is there a way to...
Hello SEC filers! As discussed here, the SEC’s mandate for Pay vs. Performance iXBRL tagging requirements become effective for all Proxy or Information Statements which require Item 402 Executive Compensation (commonly filed as SEC Forms DEF 14A o...
It looks the objectives of the proposed Meta Model is to add base level accounting model relationships to the existing Taxonomy. I am wondering how this will impact XBRL tagging? Thanks.
Hi Support! I'm getting an error on my tax rate reconciliation calculation. I think I narrowed down the cause to the new FDII percent concept. Workiva is showing FDII as additive while the taxonomy is showing it as a reduction. Could you please co...
Dear, I would like to know how we can do a value tag, but have it be presented as a word.In the case of the company we are working with, we noticed that when the 20-F was filed, in the Inline XBRL Viewer (SEC) the tagging of the word outstanding h...
Will Workiva be bringing back in-person or virtual XBRL Training. When my old employer had to start doing XBRL, my team went (and paid for) about a week long in person course that went into everything XBRL and how to use Workiva for tagging. Now I...
The SEC just approved the "Pay vs. Performance" proposal (https://www.sec.gov/rules/final/2022/34-95607.pdf) which means that nearly all filers will need to tag on their first proxy filing after December 2022, which equates to spring 2023 for cale...
When I look at my SEC viewer, I see footnotes tagged to a line in my face financial. When I look at the line in XBRL there is no footnotes tagged at the bottom of the tagging details in the face financial. This line also appears in a footnote wher...
I am receiving hidden fact warning errors for two different facts that are NOT in a non-print section. In both instances, the fact that is getting the error in the only fact in its respective section receiving the error, despite there being severa...
