How to define Default to "Portion At Fair Value Fair Value Disclosure Member"?
답변함Any advice?
Thanks.
-
Hi Stella!
I believe I can help you resolve this issue. If you follow the steps outlined in this post, it should fix what you are seeing. Specifically, you'll want to look at the steps following Item 3 with the paragraph starting "In case of the single exception..."
If this does not resolve the issue for you, or if you have any questions on the steps in the link provided, let me know and I'll be happy to help. Have a great day in the meantime. Cheers!0
Hi Mike!
Thanks for the post!
The link "in this post" is not working, would you mind relinking?
Also, I think it's the same topic, but for "Portion at Fair Value Measurement [Member]", I remember a few years ago, this was needed due to the structuring 'error' in the taxonomy, even though it may not be used. We still have this in the outline, and when we tried removing, it would show some sort of error (see screenshot). I didn't dare share the changes to find out the errors.
So my question, is this member still required even though we don't use it? Went to the taxonomy and it says 'default' - so does it mean it's still needed?
Thanks a lot!
0
Hi Daisy!
Snap, good catch. That link is from our previous site and I'm not finding it on our new platform. I'll see if I can find the content we had on it, but to answer your nagging question, yes, this weird taxonomy quirk is still required. Here's what it should look like in next gen, for example:
Does this help? Let me know what questions you have and I'll keep digging in the meantime to see if I can resurrect that previous post. 😉Happy Friday!
0
It does help! Darn, it's here to stay... So even for next gen, it should still stay then? Thank you so much for the quick response and have a great weekend!
0
Aye, that pesky quirk is still required, even for next gen and the current taxonomy. No problem, and indeed, I did have an enjoyable weekend. Hope the same was true for you. 😊
0댓글을 남기려면 로그인하세요.
댓글
댓글 5개